The goal of this comparison is to summarize the efficacy and the operational use of the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) security solutions.
Description of properties:
"in use": indicates whether the solution is in operational use,
"method": indicates whether the solution is based on a cryptographic protocol or an anomaly detection service,
"origin authentication": indicates whether the origin AS is authenticated,
"path authentication": indicates whether the AS path is authenticated,
"topology authentication": indicates whether the AS paths are conforming to the correct topology.
Description of values:
A system is considered "strong" if it provides authenticity guarantees and "weak" if the data/methods used are probabilistic.
ORKG Comparisons have changed. We have added new features and improved the user interface. Comparisons might look slightly different, but the comparison data itself remains unchanged.
Butler, K., Farley, T. R., McDaniel, P., & Rexford, J. (2009). A survey of BGP security issues and solutions. Proceedings of the IEEE, 98(1), 100-122.
Huston, G., Rossi, M., & Armitage, G. (2010). Securing BGP—A literature survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 13(2), 199-222.
Mitseva, A., Panchenko, A., & Engel, T. (2018). The state of affairs in BGP security: A survey of attacks and defenses. Computer Communications, 124, 45-60.